The overall structure of the project was designed to identify clear defined work packages with one main responsible partner.

The architecture of the tool environment identifies three layers with different functionality (i.e., abstraction level) and a different partner who is responsible for it. A fourth partner is responsible for the backbone of the system (the ontological aspect that is used by all three layers) and a fifth partner develops the methodological aspect on how to apply the tool in given application contexts. Finally, each of the three case studies has one application partner as main responsible partner.

The Figure illustrates the architecture of our project team in terms of the architecture of the developed tool, methods, and case studies.



The table explains the different roles of the partners.

Partner

Role

Task

P1. VU - Free University of Amsterdam

Methodology Provider,
Coordinator

Method Development

Tool Development

P2. AIFB - University of Karlsruhe

Methodology Provider

Method Development

Tool Development

P3.�@ Swiss Life

User

Evaluation

P4.�@ BT - British Telecom

Technology Developer,
User

Tool Development

Evaluation and Learning,

Exploitation

P5. CognIT

Technology Developer

Tool Development

Exploitation

P6. Enersearch

User

Evaluation

P7. Aidministrator

Technology Developer

Tool Development

Exploitation

P8. OntoText Lab. – Sirma AI Ltd.

Technology Developer

Infrastructure Development

Tool Development