The overall structure of the project was designed to identify clear defined work
packages with one main responsible partner.
The architecture of the tool environment identifies three layers with different functionality (i.e., abstraction level) and a
different partner who is responsible for it. A fourth partner is responsible for the
backbone of the system (the ontological aspect that is used by all three layers) and a
fifth partner develops the methodological aspect on how to apply the tool in given
application contexts. Finally, each of the three case studies has one application partner
as main responsible partner.
The Figure illustrates the architecture of our project team in terms of
the architecture of the developed tool, methods, and case studies.
The table explains the different roles of the partners.
Partner
|
Role
|
Task
|
P1. VU - Free
University of Amsterdam
|
Methodology Provider,
Coordinator
|
Method Development
|
Tool Development
|
P2. AIFB -
University of Karlsruhe
|
Methodology Provider
|
Method Development
|
Tool Development
|
P3.�@ Swiss Life
|
User
|
Evaluation
|
P4.�@ BT - British Telecom
|
Technology Developer,
User
|
Tool Development
|
Evaluation and Learning,
|
Exploitation
|
P5. CognIT
|
Technology Developer
|
Tool Development
|
Exploitation
|
P6. Enersearch
|
User
|
Evaluation
|
P7.
Aidministrator
|
Technology Developer
|
Tool Development
|
Exploitation
|
P8.
OntoText Lab. – Sirma AI Ltd.
|
Technology Developer
|
Infrastructure Development
|
Tool Development
|
|